Aqueous Coating Vs Matte Lamination

Polypropylene lamination is the most popular and least expensive laminate available today.

Aqueous coating vs matte lamination.

Consider matte coating for minimal shine and depth but a high degree of color. As the number one advantage of aqueous coatings is the cost savings a major deterrent to the use of film lamination is the price. Gloss lamination can be one of the most important decisions in a print project. It also provides a softer more natural look that makes it easier to read the printed piece.

High volume production of many packaging applications prohibits the use of thermal lamination because of the expense of the film itself and the slower off line application used to apply the film compared to uv or water based coatings. The initial cost to implement the uv coaters into a shop may be higher than a lamination setup especially if a ventilation system has to be put into place. Matte and gloss aqueous coatings are very cost effective and do not add any extra time to the production of your printed project. In fact the choice between matte vs.

It is available in gloss satin and matte finishes. A great example of the glossiness of uv coating are baseball trading cards. Matte lamination produces an elegant sophisticated finish. When plastic coating is added to any item it becomes tear proof and waterproof since the laminating film encapsulates the item completely by bonding it to both sides.

Different types of aq aqueous coating. Trading cards in general have a uv coating on the photo side and no coating on the stat side. If you re looking for a less showy and more muted gloss finish aq coating is an ideal solution for a high gloss uv coating or film laminates are better options.